Right was to stop Sweden democrats

A couple of weeks ago I wrote about my negative view of the liberal party Folkpartiet´s suggestion to ban face veils in schools just weeks before the election. I interpreted that as part of an attempt to hinder the Sweden democrats from entering parliament. But in my opinion it´s not the right way to handle the problem by partly accepting their agenda.

it is much better what has happened in the last days - a total rejection of the Sweden democrats world view (just the name "democrats"..). Channel four decided to not show the party´s election commercial movie, claiming it was breaking the law by making racist remarks (rightly so,

watch it here

). The commercial features women in burqa competing with senior citizen´s to get money from the state. A really awful and disgusting message.

Even better than Channel four´s decision was the documentary made by Lena Sundström, a documentary where she examines the statistics often presented by the Sweden democrats - as it turns out - it is false! How surprising... Watch part of it here (In Swedish)

No, immigrants are not naturally more involved in crime, class is a stronger factor with risc of getting involved in crime. And its not a "dangerous" neighborhood just because it lives immigrants in that area. The more media put forward these issues before the election, the better. And hopefully we can avoid the real threat to Sweden´s democratic society - a stronger Sweden democracy party.

/ The Cat Goes Political

New York times discusses Sweden´s form of government

I am a member of this association myself and attended this meeting (but not pictured in the article). New York Times were there and the result was a very interresting article about Sweden´s form of government, discussing if a monarchy or a republic is the best form of government in Sweden (my own opinion is obvious).

/ The Cat Goes Political

Sweden 3rd best in the world!

Newsweek recently published a list which ranks the best countries in the world. Sweden was ranked third ont his list which includes Quality of life, level of education and health care.Life is Swede...:)

/ The Cat Goes Political

The Colbert Report	Mon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Newsweek Ranks the World's Best Countries
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes 2010 Election Fox News

Islam and USA

Very interresting discussion about islam´s relations with the U.S. And also about the founding father´s positive view on islam. The Daily show with Jon Stewart.

/ The Cat goes political

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart	Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Akbar Ahmed
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor Tea Party

Wrong way to stop Sweden democrats

The liberal party Folkpartiet Liberalerna announced today that they want to ban face veils such as niqabs or burquas in Swedish schools.

The argument is that it should be easier to see and communicate with each other and that teachers are suppose to see that they are grading the right pupil.

First I am not going to discuss the issue itself. What strikes me more is the timing of the announcement.

In September its election. It comes at a time where the extreme right-wing party The Sweden democrats have shown risng numbers in the polls. They are close to making the four percent limit line of votes which is required to get seates in the Swedish parliament. This is of course a way to try to bloc them from getting votes, but in my opinion its note the right way to handle this problem.

One should discuss the integration question in large instead of throwing out populist proposals just before the election. By doing like Folkpartiet we are pushing the limits for what is acceptable in society and I believe that unfortunately benefits the Sweden democrats in the long run. The next proposal to blocing the Sweden democrats from the Swedish parliament might be more extreme, the next even more extreme. And so it might continue election after election, which would of course be a dangerous development. I want real discussion about integration, then the Sweden democrats will show their true face and also lose votes. That is my conviction.


This comes not long after the decision in France where as i understand it, no one can no longer wear face weils in public, which I must say is frightening. Of course you must be ablo wear what you want when youre walking on the street!

What is interresting about this subject in general is that it shows one of the fundamental issues within democracy which has to be discussed on a regular basis: When different values which can all be attributed to democracy are clashing.

Take this latest proposal from Folkpartiet. One might argue one must be able to coomunicate in a democracy, especially in a vital institution such as the school. Also, one might claim religion should not be "visible" in the secular "neutral" school. On the other hand you can claim it is violating one´s freedom of religious beliefs. We MUST discuss this and get a intelligent and civilised debate. Otherwise The sweden democrats can continue to blame all society´s ills on immigrants.

The ideologial scale in Sweden – Consensus or sharp contrasts? Part 2

Yesterday we discussed the differences between the right and left-wing. Today we will ask poltical scientist Jenny Madestam detailed questions about the differences between the parties themselves. Before we begin, those of you not so familiar with Swedish politics should be informed that the right wing consists of the Moderate party, the Centre party, the Christian democrats and the People´s party liberals and the left-wing consists of the Social democrats, the Left party and the Green party.

As stated in the last article, the right-wing won government power in the last election in 2006. This newfound position in office has caused several changes in political directions between those parties in order to create a well-functioning corporation between the parties.

- I would say that the Centre party and the Christian democrats are facing an identical crisis. You can say both have sold their soul. The Centre party have given up their resistence to nuclear power and the party leader Maud Olofsson has stated they are a liberal party, having a history of corporation with the Social democrats. She has begun to talk more about the right of the individual and rethorical words such as freedom, Jenny Madestam explains.

- Conservative Christian democrats gave up their opinion about not allowing same-sex-marriage, which all the other parties are in favour of.

- The People´s party liberals have gone from a social liberal direction to a more “demanding” liberalism, a tougher demand on the individuals in society, even if party leader Jan Björklund has mentioned social liberalism in his speeches, she says.

The biggest party within the right-wing alliance, the Moderate party, has had a history of a mixture between conservatism and liberalism, which may explain their new direction in both rethoric and practice. All these changes on this side of the political side can be summarized due to the fact that both liberalism and conservatism have had their home here. It is not like in for example in the U.S. Where liberalism can be labelled “left-wing”.

- Maybe we have a narrow view of right-wing politics in Sweden. Those ideologies are from the beginning each others opposites. Earlier it has been easier to see differences between the right-wing parties, but the changes have been possible due to that both these ideologies belong on this side of the scale. This has in turn been possible because both ideologies has challenged the left wings view on the need for a big state in the welfare system. she concludes.

On the left-wing one tend to divide up the parties between the green party, the Social democrats and the Left party with the latter most to the left and the first party most to the right. But due to the fact that these parties also have to cooperate changes can be visible also here.

- The Left party has been forced to go more to the right in the agreements with the other left-wing parties. But I am sure there are a lot of people within the party which would like to see for example higher taxes.

Party leader Lars Ohly was also forced to stop calling himself a communist a couple of years ago, as both media and the people reacted strongly towards Ohly labelling himself that.

All these radical shifts in direction in the course of only a couple of years has of course made it really difficult to place the parties on an obvious ideologial scale. And it may happen more. The Sweden democrats which have expressed opinions against immigration may enter the parliament after the election which can force parties to cooperate despite ideological differences to block that partiy´s influence.

Sharp constrats or consensus? Nothing really, or both maybe...

/The cat goes political

The ideologial scale in Sweden – Consensus or sharp contrasts? Part 1

Election day is getting closer in Sweden. In September it will be decided if the current right-wing government will extend their time in power with another four-year-term. Or will the left/green-party opposition take revenge for last election when they lost after 12 years in office? Both will fight to form government and they will do everything to distinguish themselves from each other. The campaigning is getting more and more intense. Both sides are doing their best to portray their opponent as a worst case scenario and themselves as the only possible way.

In recent years, however, opinions have grown that the parties have become more and more similar to each other and difficult for the voters to separate between the sides. On the other hand there are people who claim there are major differences. To get to the bottom of these contradicting opinions, I decided to call someone who maybe can shed some light on this mater: Political scientist Jenny Madestam at Stockholm University.

- I do feel there is a difference between the two alliances (left/green and right). The latest suggestions for an economical budget point to that they both with concern for the welfare state. But the means to get there are different, Madestam says.

- The right-wing proposes cut-downs in the social insurance system which they believe pushes people to search for a job. The left wing wants to raise taxes in order to give people a secure income, she explains.

So, it seems that according to Jenny Madestam this is where the big difference lie – in the mater of politics regarding employment and economic compensation for the unemployed. But both sides claim they put great value into the welfare state – which was maybe not so clearly expressed from the right wing government a couple of years ago. The biggest party within this alliance, the Moderate party, won the last election probably because they launched a broader image to the voters.

- Prime minister Fredrik Reinfeldt has been good at borrowing messages and rhetoric from the Social democrats, says Madestam but at the same time withholds that they in practice have moved in a more social liberal direction.

This may be confusing to voters who might have a hard time to see clear alternatives to choose from. And Madestam also believe parties portray their opponent to give the voters just that – a clear “good” option in stark contrast to the other “darker” side.

- Maybe they exaggerate the differences between them. If you listen to the latest speeches you can get that impression. Its true there are two different ideological sides but its not a question of two completely different systems.

In part 2 tomorrow we will go more into detail and ask Jenny about the ideological standpoints and differences between the parties and not just between the two alliances.