Friday 16 July 2010

The ideologial scale in Sweden – Consensus or sharp contrasts? Part 2

Yesterday we discussed the differences between the right and left-wing. Today we will ask poltical scientist Jenny Madestam detailed questions about the differences between the parties themselves. Before we begin, those of you not so familiar with Swedish politics should be informed that the right wing consists of the Moderate party, the Centre party, the Christian democrats and the People´s party liberals and the left-wing consists of the Social democrats, the Left party and the Green party.

As stated in the last article, the right-wing won government power in the last election in 2006. This newfound position in office has caused several changes in political directions between those parties in order to create a well-functioning corporation between the parties.

- I would say that the Centre party and the Christian democrats are facing an identical crisis. You can say both have sold their soul. The Centre party have given up their resistence to nuclear power and the party leader Maud Olofsson has stated they are a liberal party, having a history of corporation with the Social democrats. She has begun to talk more about the right of the individual and rethorical words such as freedom, Jenny Madestam explains.

- Conservative Christian democrats gave up their opinion about not allowing same-sex-marriage, which all the other parties are in favour of.

- The People´s party liberals have gone from a social liberal direction to a more “demanding” liberalism, a tougher demand on the individuals in society, even if party leader Jan Björklund has mentioned social liberalism in his speeches, she says.

The biggest party within the right-wing alliance, the Moderate party, has had a history of a mixture between conservatism and liberalism, which may explain their new direction in both rethoric and practice. All these changes on this side of the political side can be summarized due to the fact that both liberalism and conservatism have had their home here. It is not like in for example in the U.S. Where liberalism can be labelled “left-wing”.

- Maybe we have a narrow view of right-wing politics in Sweden. Those ideologies are from the beginning each others opposites. Earlier it has been easier to see differences between the right-wing parties, but the changes have been possible due to that both these ideologies belong on this side of the scale. This has in turn been possible because both ideologies has challenged the left wings view on the need for a big state in the welfare system. she concludes.

On the left-wing one tend to divide up the parties between the green party, the Social democrats and the Left party with the latter most to the left and the first party most to the right. But due to the fact that these parties also have to cooperate changes can be visible also here.

- The Left party has been forced to go more to the right in the agreements with the other left-wing parties. But I am sure there are a lot of people within the party which would like to see for example higher taxes.

Party leader Lars Ohly was also forced to stop calling himself a communist a couple of years ago, as both media and the people reacted strongly towards Ohly labelling himself that.

All these radical shifts in direction in the course of only a couple of years has of course made it really difficult to place the parties on an obvious ideologial scale. And it may happen more. The Sweden democrats which have expressed opinions against immigration may enter the parliament after the election which can force parties to cooperate despite ideological differences to block that partiy´s influence.

Sharp constrats or consensus? Nothing really, or both maybe...

/The cat goes political

No comments:

Post a Comment